Finest young minds confront California drought

 The UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences recently developed a tool to quantitatively evaluate these water management options. Working with the Nature Conservancy, we designed the model to assess strategies for restoring populations of native fish on Mill Creek, a tributary of the Sacramento River. -- Jenny Ta, Joshua Viers, California Water Blog, June 14, 2015

Our society or economy or whatever this delusionary bubble we inhabit could properly be called has a particular genius for patting its own little head like a doting mother saying how intelligent we really are. We do this funding enormous technological (if not scientific) institutions and certain mammoth non-profits that have proved themselves capable of cashing in on the charitable fashions du jour that make us feel moral.
Having made these commitments we should not be surprised that the University of California and The Nature Conservancy (longtime corrupt partners in spending millions in public funds in places like Merced CA) have found funding somewhere to study the drought. This mirrors UC's continual efforts to locate a medical school at UC Merced with a specialty in respiratory illness research because, after all, the agribusiness and residential growth UC has done so much to promote has created a population with endemic ... respiratory illness.
So much for the "greatest public research educational institution in the world," forever gazing outward upon the phenomena in its environment and asking that one, all-important, critical but never spoken question: What will funders refuse to allow the public to know?
For example: the total failure of all of the political economic superstructure of the state -- from UC through the federal and state resource agencies down to the boards of directors of irrigation districts to local, state and federal politicians -- to plan for regularly occurring droughts exacerbated by global warming.
Now, wouldn't that make an excellent topic for contemporary "scientific" research? No, actually. There is absolutely nothing in that question that flatters our minds, morals or the political economic system that extrudes at the top like an over-pumped zerk the funds for research.
The state might have been in decent shape at least in mind and spirit, to cope with the summer of 2015 if this mob of bought leaders had devoted a fraction of their time to planning for the reality instead of devoting all of their time to denying it at the command of corporations with quarter-hour attention spans but maniacal focus on their bottom lines.
This drought will hold no surprises for anyone who has spent time attempting to argue rationally against the destruction of natural resources in the San Joaquin Valley. In fact, past articles from Badlands Journal may help provide some perspective on the present situation. And Badlands has links to other sites providing complementary perspectives. -- blj






California Water Blog
Making the most of little water — with spreadsheets
Posted on June 14, 2015 by UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences
By Jenny Ta and Joshua Viers
It seems inevitable that increasing numbers of California farmers will see their claims to surface water suspended this growing season as the drought persists into a fourth year.
The State Water Resources Control Board said as much Friday (June 12) when it extended drought-related prohibitions on river diversions to irrigators with rights dating to 1903 in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and its watersheds. The order marked the first time California has limited water use for senior water rights holders since the 1976-77 drought. 
The prospect of such draconian cutbacks convinced about 200 Delta farmers with priority dates earlier than 1903 they would be better off giving up water before they began planting. In May, they negotiated an agreement with the water board to voluntarily surrender 25 percent of water supplies (from 2013 levels) this June – September growing season.
Across California, other farmers and ranchers with senior water rights will likely seek similar deals to pre-empt potentially steeper mandatory cuts. Common ways to reduce diversions from streams include voluntary curtailments, water exchanges, conjunctive use and water purchases.
The UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences recently developed a tool to quantitatively evaluate these water management options. Working with the Nature Conservancy, we designed the model to assess strategies for restoring populations of native fish on Mill Creek, a tributary of the Sacramento River.
Mill Creek hosts one of the highest elevation salmon-spawning habitats in California and is one of the few streams that still support threatened spring-run Chinook salmon. It winds southwest from Mount Lassen through a narrow canyon until it reaches the Sacramento Valley. Before joining the Sacramento River, the creek flows through the small Tehama County community of Los Molinos, where landowners with senior water rights divert flows to irrigate nut orchards and cattle pasture.
Tehama County Superior Court adjudicated Mill Creek water rights in 1920, allocating the stream’s entire discharge during low summer flows. As a result, the stream routinely goes almost completely dry during irrigation season (June through mid-October). At the request of state and federal fisheries regulators, local irrigators voluntarily agreed to provide flows for the spring and fall salmon migration this drought year and last. This year’s curtailment orders have not affected these senior water rights holders — so far.
Stream flow is critical to sustaining riverine plants and animals, many of which have adapted to historic flow patterns. These species include the foothill yellow-legged frog, whose reproduction is timed with the annual spring snowmelt, and Pacific salmon that migrate up the Sacramento and spawn in the creek.
Our water management tool is an easy-to-use spreadsheet model that calculates and identifies environmental-flow shortages based on seasonal diversion demands and water management scenarios, such as water exchanges, water-rights purchases and substituting groundwater for creek water. 
For example, we analyzed strategies for providing fish-passage flows during the spring and fall migration of Chinook salmon and steelhead trout, species of particular interest to wildlife managers.
The model identified late October as a period of water scarcity for irrigation and fish passage in both dry and wet years. Fish-flow shortages ranged from 1,600 to 2,450 acre-feet of water annually from wet to dry years, as illustrated above.
Our analysis showed that if irrigators left their water in the stream a few weeks during fall migration (late October through early November) — in return for the conservancy availing its share of creek water to irrigators from July to early October, shortages to fish-passage flows would be reduced by about 60 percent. (See table below, under “Agreement”.) If, in addition to the water exchange, irrigators pumped more water from wells instead of the creek, the passage flows could potentially be fully restored.
We did not address all factors that need to be considered in reducing water diversions, such as groundwater-river water interactions, water quality and economic trade-offs. But the tool is a useful first step in deciding how to address environmental water shortages in diverted creeks and rivers. Other salmon-bearing streams such as Deer Creek in Tehama County and the Eel River in northwestern California face similar water management challenges.
Fish-water needs aside, California landowners with senior water rights are on notice this drought year that curtailments are likely if not imminent. Those looking to pre-emptively cut a deal with the state water board, as many Delta farmers did, may benefit from quantitatively evaluating their water management options.
Jenny Ta is a graduate student of hydrologic sciences at the UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences. Joshua Viers is an associate professor at UC Merced and co-director of the UC Water Security and Sustainability Research Initiative.
Further reading
Grantham T and Viers J. “California water rights: You can’t manage what you don’t measure.” California WaterBlog. Aug. 20, 2014
Ta, Jenny. “Decision support tool for water management and environmental flows: Mill Creek case study.” Masters thesis. UC Davis. May 25, 2015
Willis A, et al. “A salmon success story during the California drought.” California WaterBlog. Jan. 20, 2015
Yarnell S. “How dam operators can breathe more life into rivers.” California WaterBlog. Feb. 1, 2015
Yarnell S. “Life springs in Sierra Rivers as springtime flows recede.” California WaterBlog, May 4, 2013
Yarnell S. Sierra frogs breed insights on river management. California WaterBlog. Oct. 3, 2012