It's the environment, stupid?
"It's a small step," Denham said. "We need thousands of jobs in the Central Valley, and we need many more projects like this."
The bill would allow the Merced Irrigation District to raise New Exchequer Dam spillways, temporarily expanding Lake McClure some years into a part of the river currently protected as free-flowing by federal law. -- Merced Sun-Star, June 20, 2012
DAMAGING THE ENVIRONMENT=MORE JOBS?
WRONG.
On a more prosaic level, how does raising a dam produce any jobs except one or two the irrigation district might create to count the money it will make selling the water to Los Angeles or Westlands Water District.
Badlands Journal editorial board
6-20-12
Merced Sun-Star
House OKs Merced River storage bill…MICHAEL DOYLE, Sun-Star Washington Bureau
http://www.mercedsunstar.com/2012/06/17/v-print/2390427/house-oks-merced...
WASHINGTON -- A divided House approved a bill Tuesday that could increase water storage in the Merced River by taking away some long-standing "wild and scenic" river protections.
Backed by farmers and local lawmakers but opposed by environmentalists and the Obama administration, the bill sponsored by Rep. Jeff Denham, R-Turlock, passed as part of a larger public lands measure package tailored by conservatives.
"It's a small step," Denham said. "We need thousands of jobs in the Central Valley, and we need many more projects like this."
The bill would allow the Merced Irrigation District to raise New Exchequer Dam spillways, temporarily expanding Lake McClure some years into a part of the river currently protected as free-flowing by federal law.
The House approved the legislation 232 to 188 and sent it to the Senate, where it faces an uncertain future.
Although Democratic Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer have not endorsed the Merced River language, neither has publicly opposed it. Behind the scenes, both senators and their staffs are reviewing the idea.
Denham's legislation is designed to help the MID plan the future of New Exchequer Dam and McClure. By raising two spillway gates 10 feet, the irrigation district would increase potential storage by as much as 70,000 acre-feet and boost hydroelectric power production by as much as 10,000 megawatts.
An acre-foot is the amount of water it would take to cover one acre 1 foot deep.
Currently, the irrigation district cannot allow McClure to expand beyond a point 867 feet above sea level. The bill would allow the lake to reach 877 feet above sea level.
In doing so, the district temporarily would inundate about a half-mile of the river that is protected under the federal wild-and-scenic law. The inundation would occur during wetter-than-normal years, for as long as 60 days.
It's a significant milestone in the effort to enhance area water supplies, Bryan Kelly, the MID's director of regulatory affairs, said in a news release. "However, there is still much more work to be done."
Kelly said that the MID recognizes conservation groups are concerned about altering wild-and-scenic boundaries. "We take those concerns seriously," he said.
"We're discussing ways to address them in a manner that would allow the spillway project to get a fair hearing before FERC," Kelly said.
It's a local concern, but it sets a national precedent. As described by opponents, the legislation marks the first time Congress would allow the inundation of a river segment protected under the wild-and-scenic program.
"Never before has Congress reversed course and eliminated federal protection to allow this kind of harm to a previously protected river," Friends of the River and other conservation groups wrote this week, adding that "our wild and scenic rivers are as important as our national parks and equally deserving of truly permanent protection."