Pivotal roles

Through the seminar, UC Merced said it's playing "a pivotal role" in helping national parks across the globe lead strategic change.-- Merced Sun-Star, March 14, 2011
Sonny Star, the local gigolo press, is strutting her stuff again. Must be spring. On the editorial page Sonny pontificates about open government laws in California, mainly the Brown Act and the state Public Records Act. In the same edition, Sonny prints the release below from UC Merced Bobcatflak Central.
The only "pivotal role" UC Merced has played to date and may ever play is anchor tenant to the worst local housing bubble in the nation. It ought to be awarded the prize for "Worst Real Estate Boondoggle of the First Decade of the 21st Century.
As far as Sonny's open government pontifications, it passes all understanding how it could print anything about the Brown Act or the PRA in this county, without any reference to the serial violations of those laws here and legal action taken against those violations by groups that have been the leaders of the environmental movement in this part of the valley for 40 years. But, of course, Sonny Star didn't actually write anything about California open meeting and record laws. It reprinted an article by one Richard McKee, about whom nothing is posted on the site of the below mentioned Californians Aware, only the time honored message: "We're sorry, but this page has been temporarily removed for updating. Please check back later." In fact, the group seems to be nothing but a commercial advertisement for itself, which is about all "Sunshine Week" is for the corporate press and its outlets like Sonny Star.
The arrival of UC Merced spelled the end of this county's hope of ever being able to tell the truth about itself even when it must, as for example, in economic crises like the present.
Badlands Journal editorial board
Merced Sun-Star
Richard McKee: A call to arms… Richard McKee is vice president for open government compliance at Californians Aware, a nonprofit coalition of public officials, news media, and concerned citizens, whose mission is to support and defend the principles of open government.
Our nation's Founding Fathers, revered for their courage and determination, knew far too well the nation they were creating was only an experiment; that persistence lay ahead if the people's government was to survive.
They openly worried that too much power placed in too few hands might wrest freedom and control away, reverting back to what they fought so hard to overcome.
Today, the American people have come face-to-face with this challenge, and California presents an excellent example.
Whether you scan local news or statewide articles, almost daily there are stories of public corruption scandals, bribery, extortion and nepotism committed by those we elect and appoint to do the people's business.
But these outrages never could have happened if the electorate had known about these deals before they occurred. Public corruption is facilitated by secrecy; backroom deals with a quid pro quo.
Almost 60 years ago, the California Legislature observed, "Legislative and administrative groups and officials through devious ways are depriving us, the public, of our inalienable right to be present and to be heard at all deliberations of governmental bodies."
The result of that observation was the enactment of California's open meetings law, the Ralph M. Brown Act, named for the assemblyman from Modesto who championed it in the Legislature.
Nevertheless, today the Legislature could make the same observation. Just look to the revelations of fraud and corruption in the cities of Bell, Vernon, South Gate, Bell Gardens, Carson, Lynwood, Colton, and the list goes on and on.
In every case the wrongdoing was well-supported by a large dose of secrecy.
In 1968, the Legislature followed up with the Public Records Act to guarantee "access to information concerning the conduct of the people's business." Then in 2004, Proposition 59 made these open government laws constitutional protections.
Yet, despite these assurances, public officials continue to raid local treasuries like kids at a candy barrel.
One of our recent public records compliance audits of school districts, colleges, and universities revealed administrators' routine use of limousine services, the fanciest hotels, $12,000/year vehicle reimbursements, tens-of-thousands in housing allowances, and contracts with automatic salary escalators of as much as $75,000 a year.
All of these "gifts" were given by our elected school boards and university regents at meetings open to the public. However, the vast majority of the time, no member of the public made even a single comment before their approval. Often, that's because no one knew of the contract or reimbursement before it was approved.
It is reasonable to assume that most of us, with annual household incomes near California's median of $60,000, might have wished to question the wisdom of giving our school district superintendent $300,000 annually, or to providing the president of our local community college a $70,000 annual bonus, or to reimbursing a university president's $450 a night stays at one of the most expensive hotels in Washington, D.C., along with $2,200 in airfare for the trip.
How about the city managers and city attorneys making over $500,000 a year, well more than the president of the United States?
The sad news is that this all happens because "we the people" don't pay any attention; a willful ignorance amply facilitated by news media that fail to keep us informed.
The usual practice is for the electorate to vote for those telling us what we want to hear, whether it's for or against an incoming Wal-Mart, funding for parks, promoting public transportation, refurbishing schools, or some other hot topic; then we return to ignoring local government as soon as we leave the polling place.
And this problem has been made more difficult by local government's eagerness to create more and more public agencies.
What do you know of your local sanitation district, or the community service, recreation, vector control, flood, water, airport, harbor, irrigation, public transportation, hospital, waste management, utilities, or cemetery districts? How about your council of governments, air quality management, or local agency formation commission?
Every one of these public boards and commissions employs staff and sets their compensation. But it's not only the salaries and obvious benefits, it's the pensions -- and, boy, are they something.
There are public employees who, at age 50, can retire with a guarantee of 90 percent of their pay and full health benefits for the rest of their lives, all obtained without ever having paid anything for these while they were working.
That's right, they contributed not a cent. All was covertly promised to be paid for by their city. Imagine working for 30 years, and then the public pays you 90 percent of your salary for, on average, the next 35 years. And we wonder why government, both local and state, is going broke.
So what's the answer? Well, for starters, it is demanding government give us much more information without us having to ask for it. Publication of all proposed employment and union contracts, with ample lead time for comment before they are voted upon.
Wider distribution of meeting agendas and backup information with a system for newspapers and the public to request these be provided to them automatically, by e-mail, at the same time they are made available to council and board members. And a public demand that our representatives stop hiding behind closed sessions.
None should be allowed for any purpose without early notice and a complete explanation of the issues to be discussed, with an invitation for the public to comment before they are held.
Open government is not enough. We must demand that government not only announce, but inform -- educate the public on the issues important to them, ask for input, and only then take action.
We must stop the problems before they become incurable. We do this by holding our public officials accountable for keeping us well-informed.
As James Madison, the father of our Constitution, warned, "A popular government without popular information or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy or perhaps both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power knowledge gives."
Merced Sun-Star
Seminar to focus on environmental issues…Sun-Star staff
Representatives of the world's national parks and reserved lands from across the globe will get together in April for an intensive, 12-day leadership program, according to UC Merced.
The National Parks Institute Executive Leadership Seminar will run from April 5-16 and address issues such as climate change, habitat loss, encroachment, budget constraints and rapidly changing leadership, a university news release said.
The program is sponsored by UC Merced, the National Park Service, the Institute at the Golden Gate, the Great Valley Center and the National Parks Conservation Association's Center for Park Management.
Through the seminar, UC Merced said it's playing "a pivotal role" in helping national parks across the globe lead strategic change.
The seminar will use the Institute at the Golden Gate in San Francisco, UC Merced and Yosemite National Park as field laboratories for discussion and learning.
Participants will meet industry leaders and innovative thinkers with expertise in leadership and park management and will be exposed to a network of global public land management leaders.
A highlight of this year's seminar will be lectures April 9 by Pulitzer Prize-winning ecologist and author E. O. Wilson and National Park Service Director Jonathan B. Jarvis.
Wilson will offer a view of a future fraught with major natural resource preservation challenges linked to human population growth and development, the news release said.
A 35-year veteran of the National Park Service, Jarvis will share his vision for leading the park service into its second 100 years. His lecture will focus on stewardship, relevancy, education and work force engagement.
In addition to Wilson and Jarvis, speakers will include: Roger C. Bales, director, UC Merced Sierra Nevada Research Institute; Steve Shackelton, associate director for visitor and resource protection, National Park Service; David Sibbet, president and founder, Grove Consultants International; Sam Traina, vice chancellor for research and dean of graduate studies, UC Merced; and UC Merced professors Lara Kueppers, Teenie Matlock and Anthony Westerling.
This year, 28 participants from six continents will gather to improve their ability to anticipate change, innovate and manage strategically, the news release said.
The seminar, which is made possible by gifts from the National Parks Conservation Association's Center for Park Management, the Toyota USA Foundation, the Yosemite Fund and the National Park Service, will provide training for international executive-level managers of parks and protected areas.