Usual suspects to debate Stanislaus County groundwater position

Submitted: Feb 02, 2014
By: 
Badlands Journal editorial board

 If Jonah, rather than going to Nineveh to preach repentance, had gone to Stanislaus County CA and set up outside the Gallo Center in Modesto, and the county, like Nineveh, had not been destroyed after his fervent preachings, the Lord might have given him roughly the same excuse:  You expected  me to destroy a half a million people and all those nuts?

 

The Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors is appointing a board “to study groundwater issues” as the almond industry gobbles up pastureland on both sides of the county. An increasing number of these plantings are beyond the reach of irrigation districts and so will require groundwater irrigation. The board will be allowed to make “recommendations” to the board. Given the stress of the drought on surface and groundwater throughout California and the combined forces of agricultural and urban development expanding far beyond the real carrying capacity of the state’s natural resources, Stanislaus, like the rest of the state, has a problem, about which a board should be convened to make recommendations.

 

Ah, but the divvil is in the details of the selection of this crew of usual suspects. But, as we are reminded by the film “Usual Suspects,” the divvil’s greatest weapon has been to convince humanity that he doesn’t exist. Hence, five monkeys on the board of supervisors sense no evil in appointing 19 members to a board on groundwater all of whom represent agricultural and urban extractors of groundwater. They will add two “community members” – presumably as attuned to the Great Valley Whine as the Modesto Bee’s community columnists are.

 

It is the same mentality that refused to establish an integrated regional water management plan like the ones in all cardinal directions from the county. It is the same mentality that is perhaps punishing whatever environmental groups are said to exist in Stanislaus County by denying any of their members a seat at the table because two groups from surrounding counties are suing the Stanislaus board for failure to obey the California Environmental Quality Act regarding new orchard plantings and groundwater pumping in the northeastern corner of the county.

 

The Stanislaus County Committee of Groundwater Extractors can be expected to study one question  to exhaustion: who gets the water – the cities or farmers?

 

The assumption behind this civic futility is that the heavens will open once again and then the county can terminate the committee, thank them, and send them back with certificates of appreciation to tack on their office walls.

 

The question that gnaws away at the confidence of Stanislaus County “leadership,” i.e. the public officials that follow the simple proposition of extracting from land the highest financial return possible, be it urban or agricultural, is this: what if this drought is the beginning of a prolonged dry period? What if the assumptions about the capacity of the natural resources of the county and the state is by an order of magnitude less than the development that has already occurred, be it the Nut Boom or the Real Estate Boom? -- blj

 

 

1-31-14

Modesto Bee

Stanislaus County leaders recommend appointments to groundwater committee…Ken Carlson

http://www.modbee.com/2014/01/31/3164605/stanislaus-county-leaders-recommend.html

Stanislaus County leaders on Friday released recommended appointments to a groundwater study committee that strike a balance among farming, urban and water district interests.

Besides giving perpetual seats to the county Farm Bureau and Agricultural Advisory Board, the recommended appointments to the 21-member Water Advisory Committee include council members from Modesto, Ceres, Turlock and Oakdale. The county also intends to appoint members associated with irrigation districts, wineries, nut orchards, ranching and well drilling.

Supervisors are scheduled to approve the appointments at their meeting Tuesday. The roster released Friday does not include nominees for two community seats on the committee. Those selections will be made Tuesday.

The county is forming the Water Advisory Committee to study groundwater problems and develop policies for managing the resource. A controversial out-of-county transfer four years ago sparked an effort to write a county ordinance with groundwater regulations. Today, the drought and an explosion of tree planting and well drilling in the eastern area of the county are adding a sense of urgency for stronger policies.

Committee members will include Stanislaus County Farm Bureau Executive Director Wayne Zipser and Tom Orvis from the Agricultural Advisory Board.

Supervisor Bill O’Brien recommends appointing Neil Hudson of the Stanislaus Water Coalition, Oakdale Councilman Donald Peterson and Louis Brichetto, of Oakdale, who was among growers who took out permits for large wells in the past several months.

Supervisor Vito Chiesa wants to appoint Turlock Irrigation District board member Rob Santos, Turlock Councilman Forrest White and Francisco Canela of West Coast Grape Farming, a division of Bronco Wine Co.

Supervisor Terry Withrow’s nominees are: Thomas Smith, who does land acquisition and vineyard development for E.&J. Gallo Winery; Richard Gemperle, a partner in Gemperle Farms and a hydrologist; and Modesto Irrigation District board member Larry Byrd.

Modesto Councilman Bill Zoslocki, Jim Mortensen and Sean Roddy are the nominees of Supervisor Dick Monteith. Roddy is a well-drilling veteran. Mortensen was a plant operations manager for Del Monte and has served on the MID water advisory committee and Modesto Chamber of Commerce land-use panel.

County Board Chairman Jim DeMartini wants to appoint political consultant Michael Lynch, Ceres Mayor Chris Vierra and Raynold Kablanow, a hydrogeologist for Ground Zero Analysis Inc. of Modesto.

DeMartini and county water resources manager Walter Ward will serve as nonvoting committee members. The panel will have 19 voting members, including 12 appointed to two-year seats and five to one-year seats. Supervisors propose to give the one-year seats to Brichetto, Byrd, Kablanow, White and Zoslocki.

On Tuesday, supervisors will select two names from the remaining list of 28 applicants to fill the other vacancies.

Officials have said the committee will hold public meetings. Before starting work on a needs assessment, it first will elect a chairman and choose a nonvoting technical committee of local experts. The panel is expected to recommend groundwater policies and directives to the Board of Supervisors.

In late October, Stanislaus became the 29th county in California to adopt a groundwater ordinance. It has language for restricting out-of-county transfers, or pumping to replace transferred surface water, but has numerous exemptions for water districts. The meaning of its prohibition on water “mining” is considered debatable.

The county Department of Environmental Resources is expected to formulate a process for reviewing permits for groundwater transfers, which could be granted if applicants show they are not harming wells on nearby property.

Lawyers for two environmental groups filed a lawsuit this week charging the county has illegally issued dozens of well permits without first requiring studies on the impact on wildlife and natural resources. The plaintiffs are Protecting Our Water and Environmental Resources and the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance.

On the agenda

The Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors will meet at 9 a.m. Tuesday in the basement chamber of Tenth Street Place, at 1010 10th St. in downtown Modesto. The following items are on the agenda:

•  The State of the County speech by board Chairman Jim DeMartini

•  Creation of city-county liaison committee to maintain good relations with Turlock

•  Final acceptance of renovations for the Psychiatric Health Facility in Ceres

 

Modesto Bee

California officials forecast “zero” water deliveries…Matt Weiser, Sacramento Bee

http://www.modbee.com/2014/01/31/3164427/california-officials-forecast.html

State officials announced Friday that 29 water agencies serving 25 million people across California can expect “zero” water deliveries from the State Water Project this summer because of the worsening drought.

Although that delivery projection could change, it is the first time a “zero allocation” forecast has been made in the 54-year history of the State Water Project, which is operated by the California Department of Water Resources and typically delivers Sierra snowmelt to cities and farms throughout the state.

The decision was among several emergency measures announced Friday to deal with a persistent statewide drought that has left the California mountain snowpack at just 12 percent of the January average.

The “zero” forecast affects urban and agricultural areas from San Jose to San Diego that depend in part on water diverted from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Most of these areas have other water sources to draw from, including local reservoirs and groundwater wells.

The State Water Project serves about 750,000 acres of farmland. Most farmers have access to surface water and groundwater, including private wells, and it’s common for them to be given short allotments in drought years. Before Friday’s announcement, the State Water Project delivery forecast was only 5 percent of the maximum amount allotted in its contracts with water agencies.

Even so, the announcement assures further conservation measures will be required, and may press some farmers to fallow land. Farms consume about three-fourths of California’s freshwater supply.

The federal government operates a separate Delta water diversion system, the Central Valley Project, which is not affected by the state forecast. Its delivery forecast is expected later this month.

“This is the most serious drought we’ve faced in modern times,” said Felicia Marcus, chairwoman of the State Water Resources Control Board, which approved the emergency measures. “We will have to collaborate our way through this as never before.”

State and federal officials announced that starting today, water diversions from the Delta, a crucial wildlife habitat and California’s largest freshwater source, will be minimized to serve only urban areas and health and safety purposes. No water will be diverted for farms.

In addition, some 5,800 junior water rights holders across the state – mainly farms – will receive notices next week that they must reduce their water diversions from streams. And water quality rules in the Delta will be adjusted, which will increase salinity for some water users in the region and may affect wildlife.

“It’s a very serious situation,” Terry Erlewine, general manager of the State Water Contractors, said in a statement. “Across the board, water districts are ramping up conservation and efficiency efforts to go beyond the conservation achievements already made.”

The zero delivery forecast does not affect water users in the Sacramento region, who are not served by the State Water Project. But the capital area faces its own shortages and is enacting broad conservation measures.

On Thursday, for instance, the board of directors of the Placer County Water Agency will vote on an emergency declaration and call on customers to reduce water consumption by 35 percent. It will also consider an emergency public works project to install temporary pumps and piping to improve access to water from two existing wells.

The Delta water quality rules are being adjusted so that state and federal agencies can preserve water stored in reservoirs, primarily in the Sacramento River watershed. This will ensure that water is available, in the event the drought continues, to deliver to people in the hot months ahead and to ensure salmon and other fish can survive in the rivers.

“Today’s action means everyone will get less water as a result,” said DWR director Mark Cowin. “There’s simply not enough to go around.”

Another change allows water agencies to open the Delta Cross Channel Gates near Walnut Grove. Those gates divert a portion of Sacramento River flows into the interior Delta, where it is then diverted by state and federal pumps. Open gates mean less fresh water will flow out of the Delta to San Francisco Bay, and portions of the western Delta will become saltier. But officials said they expect those western Delta waters will still meet drinking water standards.

The gates are normally closed at this time of year to ensure that young salmon migrating downstream to the ocean are not sidetracked. Opening them now means those salmon are more likely to be eaten by predators in the interior Delta or killed in water diversion pumps.

Officials may adjust the gates daily to avoid harm to salmon. Juvenile salmon are prone to migrate during daylight hours, then seek protected areas and stay in place at night. So the gates may be opened only at night, when salmon are less active.

The water board, which oversees water quality and water rights statewide, plans to review all the changes on an ongoing basis and amend them as necessary. It also plans to beef up its enforcement reach. Tom Howard, water board executive director, said some employees would be retrained to do inspection work in the field to ensure junior water rights holders heed the curtailment order.

Local agencies that depend on the State Water Project greeted Friday’s news with alarm. Many expected a low allocation, but zero was a shock.

“I never though in my entire career I’d see a zero allocation,” said Jim Beck, general manager of the Kern County Water Agency.

Beck has worked for the agency for 30 years. It is the largest agricultural water contractor in the State Water Project system and also serves urban areas including Bakersfield, Taft and Tehachapi. He said farmers will be able to draw from a vast groundwater banking system operated by the agency and, in some cases, from private wells.

But that water won’t go far enough, he said, and many farmers will be in “survival mode” this year.

“Our growers are going to have to make really tough decisions on which crops they can fallow and which trees or vines they can take out of production,” Beck said.

Marty Lugo, spokeswoman for the Santa Clara Valley Water District, said her district was hurting even before the announcement. The district holds State Water Project contracts for as much 100,000 acre-feet of water each year. Until today, its allocation for this year was 5,000 acre-feet – about 1 percent of the water distributed by the district.

“We already expected we would get a small amount, if any at all,” Lugo said, adding that annual water demand for the district is 365,000 acre-feet.

The district has taken steps to cut water usage by 10 percent. Its groundwater supplies are expected to drop below 300,000 acre-feet by the end of the year.

At nearby Alameda County Water District, about 40 percent of water supplies typically come from state allocations, said assistant general manager Robert Shaver. “Obviously, it’s a pretty serious situation whether it’s at 5 percent or zero percent,” he said. “We had kind of been expecting that it would go to zero percent.”

To make up for the lack of water from the state, Shaver’s district will rely more heavily on groundwater. Those supplies will be tight, he said, as the year progresses. The district has asked customers to cut water use by 20 percent.

Bill Jennings, executive director of the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, worries that the emergency changes, along with the drought itself, could push some imperiled Delta fish species toward extinction.

“Yes, fish are going to suffer. Population crashes occur during these periods,” Jennings said. “We can cast blame, but we’re in this situation and they don’t have a lot of leeway. Everybody’s going to pay a price this year.”

 

| »

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

To manage site Login